Writing a title for yesterday's post, I could not remember where this phrase. But whence came the name of the office today, I remember - A dog in the manger.
Psychologists have long argued about the dangers or benefits of crying and agreed that it helps someone, and someone, for example, a person is too emotional, drives the even more serious condition.
They say that crying brings relief to the collective or the person who has to comfort. But crying alone, crying in public or that are configured to have a negative plachaschemu, the same negative reaction to the weeping and gives.
The psychologist wrote:.
Tears suggests the possibility of comfort, ease, and when these opportunities do not, we do not cry.
Indeed, there are naityazheleyshie situations in which people gather in a fist all his will and comes out the winner. But if instead he cried in anticipation of consolation, he would not have such.
Another found an interesting opinion:.
Renowned educator and psychologist Soloveitchik offers us think about the people's ancient wisdom: ... Indeed, every cry of nature is conceived as a signal of distress, a call for help. Crying should be comforted, that is the deeper meaning of tears, if comfort does not come, physiological and biochemical processes do not receive the discharge, there is only a bitter aftertaste. Harmful to the child cry, - says a teacher from around the world - a reassurance of the child and raise him up!.
So, I 'm going too, in the opinion of those who argue that it is better not cry. Well, except occasionally, only when you are crying to get better. And you should pay attention to the fact that animals do not cry. Do not Cry is a human concept that does not shed tears. Perhaps this is their psychological defense against stress - do not wait for the consolation, but to act. Or just wait out a bad period of my life.
